December 1, 2022

Weekly Oracle

Complete News World

Anne Frank may have been reprimanded by a Jewish notary for saving her family

Who condemned Anne Frank and his family to the Nazis in 1944? A book based on the investigation of a former FBI agent points to a Jewish notary as the main suspect in what he allegedly did to save his own family.

The notary, Arnold van den Berg, may have revealed where the Frank family was hiding in Amsterdam, says the author of a six-year trial in an unresolved case whose results were “Who betrayed Ann Frank? Canadian author Rosemary Sullivan, who wrote Tuesday in French HarperColls 19 pages (420)). Comes out with versions.

Evidence against Mr Van den Berg identifies modern tactics and an anonymous letter sent to Anne Frank’s father after World War II as a notary public.

The Ann Frank House Museum said it was “impressed” by retired Federal Bureau of Investigation detective Vince Bangkok’s investigation, but insisted further investigation was needed.

The teenager, who has been known around the world since the publication of her diary, written between 1942 and 1944, was hiding in a secret apartment in Amsterdam with her family when she was arrested in 1944 and died the following year, at the age of 15, in Bergen. Belson concentration camp.

Various theories were spread as to what led to the test that revealed the family’s hidden connection.

In 2016, retired FBI detective Vince Bangkok was listed by a Dutch documentary filmmaker to lead the team involved in solving this “cold case”.

The name of van den Berg, who died in 1950, has received little attention so far. He was a founding member of the Notary Jewish Council, an administrative body used by the Nazis to regulate deportation.

See also  Écrasement à Haïti: un Québécois perd la vie

According to investigators, his family was exempt from deportation, which was withdrawn during Franks’ betrayal, but the deportation did not eventually take place.

Missing from the radar at the end of the Notary War, he survived with his family.

But the Dutch media reported that the most pressing component was the seriousness with which Otto Frank made the accusation.

Anne’s father told investigators in 1964 that he had received a letter from Van Den Berke betraying the Franks and several Jewish families after the war.

Mr. of that letter. The copy, made by Frank, was found by investigators in the custody of a police officer.

“We do not have a smoking rifle, but a hot gun with hollow sheaths,” Bangkok was quoted as saying by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS.

Ronald Leopold, managing director of Anne Frank House, warned that there were questions about the anonymous letter and that further investigation was needed.

“If you’re not 100 or 200 percent sure, you have to be very careful in writing someone in history like the one who betrayed Anne Frank,” he told AFP. Told AFP.

Other experts were very critical. “Defamatory nonsense”, Bart van der Boom, a professor at Leiden University, reacted harshly to public television NOS.

“They (investigators) say he’s not hidden, so he had to buy his protection the other way around, but it’s not known where he is,” he said.

Mr Van den Berg’s granddaughter told researchers about her family history and their findings last weekend. He declined to comment on the case to NOS.

See also  «Aucune pitié» pour les meurtriers de la fille du «cerveau de Poutine»